Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:16

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Chevy Corvette Looking To Steal Mustang GTD Nurburgring Record: Report - The Drive
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Biotech pauses trial after second patient death linked to gene therapy - The Washington Post
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
There's a Giant Problem With SpaceX's Starlink Satellites - futurism.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Steelers sign Aaron Rodgers, pending a physical - NBC Sports